Skip to main content

7/9 Reflection

    Today we were given time to work on our book reviews since it was due tomorrow. I was mostly finished so I checked my AWL, readability, and the score for paper rater.  My AWL wasn't too low. Mr. Paterson told us that since it is a book review our AWL score can be low, which is about 4. Mine at that time was 4.61 so I thought I would give it a try to make the score higher. In the first half of the class, I worked on making my AWL score higher. I eventually made it to 5.25. Then I checked my readability, and it was 10.57 so I moved on. Then I went to use paper rater. It was my first time using the new tool. I had a weird feeling getting a score for my book review before I get graded for it. At first, it was 80, but I wanted it to get higher so I followed the advice and solved some problems in my writing. I got a final score of 83 and I felt satisfied with that score so I stopped there. 
    In the last few minutes of the class, I used turn it in to check to see if my plagiarism percentage has decreased. However, it increased to 9%. I found out why; the system checked my reference as plagiarism. Mr. Paterson said that he would ignore these kinds of checks because he knows that it is just a mistake. However, I didn't want it to 9% so I rephrased some sentences and submitted again at home. At home I checked the score and it decreased to 8% again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

9/30 Reflection

Today Mr. Paterson introduces us to a tool that shows us if our choices of color are color-blind friendly. I never thought of the color choices that deeply. I knew that some combinations of colors are hard to see but just for normal people. When we checked our site, there wasn’t that much to fix but I learned that there are choices that normal people can’t notice.  Today the class was supposed to start the presentations but we were given more time. I hope that we can do a better presentation than the last one. 

2021/10/12

    Today in class, we were introduced to the world-systems theory. This theory was developed by Immanuel Wallerstein. Mr. Paterson showed us a graph with Kondratiev waves, when the graph goes up the monopoly of the technology and when it goes down the monopoly ends. This suggests that the world is divided into 3 countries, ①core countries, ②semi-periphery countries, and ③periphery countries. It argues that technology gets passed down through generations; rich countries get to use the new high-tech stuff first and when they are done with it, the poorer countries get to use it, when it's not high-tech anymore. The richer countries don't like it when other countries infringe on their monopoly and they try to come into the "core countries". They don't like sharing so it's very rare for semi-periphery countries to bump up to the core countries. One example was when the US was developing rapidly and becoming a bigger country, Britain, France, and Spain fought in th...

2021/2/9

      Today Mr. Paterson told us about the compare and contrast essay paper that we are going to turn in for this semester. When I was first informed that we didn't need to read our book like we did last semester for the first time I was very relieved. When I read books for assignments I have to constantly leave my antenna out on things like symbolism, tone, the author's thoughts, etc and it doesn't let me enjoy the book. The book becomes a pain when I have to think constantly about something else than the plot itself. I'm also relieved that we won't need a bibliography in this essay. This would save me time since I won't need to put articles from google scholar that I used hours to find. We just had a research assignment, and f inding reliable sources are very difficult. But since I had Zotero, it saves me a lot of time compared to the students who don't have it.      We decided to film our video this weekend. I hope we get enough footage to make the video...