Today in our class we watched a documentary "Constructing Public Opinion". The documentary started off with a song by Rage Against the Machine. This band was banned from most of the radios because it was banned from the Clear Channel. 70% of radios were owned by Clear Channel so their songs couldn't be heard from the radio. Then the documentary went on to say things about how the public opinion is mostly liberal; for example, 80% want gun control, and 75% want more money on healthcare. So if politicians reflect these opinions then most social problems would be more looked into, but this is not happening. This is because politicians aren't serving normal people but they are serving rich people. Since they are supported with money, politicians pass laws in favor of them. The documentary also mentioned the fact that people tend to think that the middle ground is the safest and stay away from the extreme.
It was shocking to me that even though the public opinion is mostly liberal, American politics don't reflect this public opinion. If more people knew about the bribery and corruption going on in the government, these social problems that the public wants would be more looked into. Another thing that was interesting to me was that the "moderate" people stay away from being "extreme." I see that a lot in Japan, for example, I hear that some people vote for Jimintou because they think that other parties' policies are too extreme just because they are demanding change. I'm guessing that people who call themselves "moderate", don't want sudden change making them slightly conservative. Knowing both sides of the extreme would make our perspective wider and allow us to critically examine the policies of the government.
【NOTES】
Rage against the machine
All of their songs were banned from the clear channel
Dixie chicks critical about George bush
70% radios owned by clear channel
Frequently banned songs
Saturday night live
80% gun control
Healthcare 75%
If politicians 意見を反映 then these problems and issues would be solved more looked into
They aren’t serving normal people
They are serving rich people
Because they are supported with money by them
Bribery and corruption
They pass laws for them in favor of them
What the people want is never 実現
Liberal high government intervention, spending on social programs, specific policies
Vague general terms if worded that way people just support them
Peoples support will be different if worded specifically 戦略
Specifics get a very different answer
Politicians only say vague policies
Moderate
The moderate people think the middle ground is the safest
It might result in a worse situation
We have to critically examine the extreme and both sides
Only differs when the policy doesn’t include money
Human rights non-money issues
Media trying to manipulateChanging the topic
Comments
Post a Comment